Housing stress and homelessness worse in regional Australia

homelessness in regional australiaA Salvation Army report has found nearly 70 per cent of the charity’s clients are experiencing extreme housing stress, prompting calls for poverty to become a key election issue.

The Salvos have surveyed 1,600 clients, with the results showing that 68 per cent of respondents are using nearly two-thirds of their disposable income on housing, placing them in extreme housing stress.

The charity’s fifth annual Economic and Social Impact Survey identified those in regional areas as being particularly vulnerable.

Salvation Army spokesman Major Bruce Harmer said the problem needed more attention from the country’s politicians.

“We need our politicians at all levels to partner with us so we can improve the lot of so many Australians doing it tough,” he said.

“There’s a big impact on kids, with some 40 per cent saying they’d moved houses three times in 12 months.

“You know what kind of impact that having is on the education of those children?”

The survey also found that 86 per cent of clients went without basic items at times, and only one in five could afford medical treatment or medicine for their children.

Major Harmer said the results were disheartening.

“To think that kids are going without medication because Mum and Dad simply can’t afford to buy it,” he said. To read more click here.

The 3rd Australian Regional Development Conference; Participation and Progress will be held in Canberra on 5 – 6 September 2016 to register for the conference CLICK HERE.

The conference explores opportunities for innovation in regional Australia. With its rich resources, diversity, and value, regional Australia is the catalyst for the future.

Addressing issues such as sustainable development, environmental sustainability, land use, community development, investment, agribusiness and innovation it is an opportunity not to be missed.

Tagged  , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Comment

  1. Homeless and housing stress are probably worse in regional Australia as incomes are lower. This is probably because we have so many farms which are marginally profitable. We need to recast agriculture policy to focus on the 20% of farmers who produce 80% of the product, not the 70% of farmers who produce 20% of the product.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *